Subject:
|
Re: Poll: Use of Images in Signatures
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:13:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3276 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd,
In the below-quoted message, some of the lines are exactly 80
characters. This causes them to wrap in my newsreader (GNU Emacs +
GNUS). Please change the wrapping code to wrap at 72 which has long
been the USENET standard. Note that in this message I am quoting it
which adds two more characters, and in the case where a nested thread
develops it can easly get to 90 or more characters for the quoted
text.
--Bill.
"The Rev. Brendan Powell Smith" <thereverend@thereverend.com> writes:
> http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=165
>
> Thought it might be useful to have people vote to voice their opinions on the
> use of images in signature files on messages posted to LUGNET, now that this has
> become an option.
>
> The idea here is to gauge whether more LUGNET members {like} or {are annoyed by}
> images in signature files (or signature files in general), and also what sort of
> limits LUGNET members might want to see imposed on them, if any.
>
> If you don't feel that any of the possible answers reflects your opinion on the
> matter, please choose the last answer and, if you have time, explain your
> opinion with a follow-up response to this message.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -The Rev. Brendan Powell Smith
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by
little statesmen and philosophers and divines." - Emerson
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
