 | | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
I have installed a filter so that incoming articles with the header: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable are converted to 8bit encoding. The header is replaced with: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) oooh...thanks...that looks like a very, very nice module. And by Damian Conway no less. --Todd (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) check out Text::Autoformat - it does the right thing. Dan (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, Text::Wrap doesn't handle mail- and news-style quotations, and would happily convert: > >> >really especially long line of quoted text to (bad): > >> >really especially long line of quoted text instead of to (good): > >> >really (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) Yes, I've seen that too. You could always use Text::Wrap to reformat anything over 80 characters... (...) The biggest problem is the =3D in Brickshelf URL's. Even a special case to change =3D to = would be a huge help. (...) I assumed you (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) On the well-behaved e-mail clients, yes. On the worse clients, they jam a whole paragraph into a single line. I saw one which resulted in a line 890 characters long.(!) (...) I agree -- a hideously long line is better than one that's full of (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) Yes, that's what I meant. (...) It's usually at a line break, though, isn't it? And even so it is better than what is currently displayed; further refinements could be made to make it better yet... Or just let the browser do the word wrapping (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) Adding a second newline? You mean $body =~ s/=\n/\n/g or $body =~ s/=$//m ? Any of those would break words in half. (The = at the end isn't guaranteed to occur at a line break.) --Todd (21 years ago, 18-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) I think s/=$/\n/ would be adequate for that case. You could always improve it later. --Bill. (21 years ago, 18-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: quoted-printable support
|
|
(...) Heh heh, funny you should mention that... Last night I was just thinking about this again and am 98% ready to deploy a fix. I've really noticed the increase in these posts lately too (especially coming in through the News-by-Mail gateways). A (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Renaming Gaming group
|
|
(...) Shweet! :) What I think is totally cool, and Todd hasn't even mentioned, is that member web pages got automagically updated too! Brick Battles is still under the .gaming hierarchy, even though that hierarchy has moved. Thanks for saving me (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: A Change
|
|
(...) Awwww, but it'd be extreamly difficult for Todd to acknowledge every post sent in his direction! I understand exactly what you're asking Bill, but to hope/expect that Todd will comply and answer is a bit much to ask IMHO! :) --==Richard==-- (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: A Change
|
|
(...) Well, you could run two separate NNTP servers, one that requires login and one that doesn't. --Bill. (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: A Change
|
|
If you are a paid member, you can post all you like using the web interface without email authentication. Only NNTP/email users require the email authentication if they are paid members. --Bill. (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Todd is back [ was: Re: A Change ]
|
|
(...) Feels that way to us too. I for one am glad. --Bill. (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A Change
|
|
(...) Please note that it is impossible for us to know whether you have seen a post and are pondering it, or whether you missed it. A short acknowledgement of receipt for suggestions made would be a big help in this situation... --Bill. (21 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: A Change
|
|
(...) <Playful-Sarcasm On> Ohhhhhhh, I see... What a big difference! ;) <Playful-Sarcasm Off> Sorry I didn’t know such clarity was needed! (Oups, didn’t completely turn Off the sarcasm) I jus’ assumed that someone would need to hear/read the post (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: A Change
|
|
(...) Ah, but you have to understand that most forums (and whether you think of LUGNET as a forum or not, most newcomers are introduced to it via the web archive, which reads like a more traditional form) require that you sign up as a member prior (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: A Change
|
|
(...) Well, do you think "to be heard" is the same as "to get a response"? 'Cause it's not. There's often a lot of perfectly good reasons for there to be a lag between the two. The "*" for emphasis was meant to highlight the distinction between the (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: A Change
|
|
(...) Troy, I could be wrong but my understanding of the way NNTP authentication & authorization works is that it's session-based rather than message-based or function-based. That is, I think when you require a username and password at login, when (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
