|
|
 | | Re: My Airlock
|
| (...) yes, you are probably correct. (...) tsk tsk, you never take tainted data and just blindly trust it, do you? :) I agree that everything from the 'D' on is dropped, but probably because Kevin, in his infinite wisdom, made brickshelf make SURE (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: My Airlock
|
| (...) Yes, it appears that when Marlon posted that message the encoding got screwed up. He's posting from Hotmail, so that's not a surprise. I think the 3D35441 is being interpreted as just 3. I'm guessing Brickshelf uses Perl, and in Perl, when (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: My Airlock
|
| (...) I'm using the web interface for LUGNET, with MSIE 5.0. It displayed the link like that in Marlon's original post too - (URL) Clicking on the link (URL) for me reaches Kevin Loch's pictures of Mindfest. -Tim xfut -> admin.nntp (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: lugnet.alpha-team and lugnet.sports [was Re: I am not so sure on how to say this in here.]
|
| (...) I believe admins have already discussed this as a possibility, talking of creating a lugnet.sport with subgroups lugnet.sport.football, et al, IIRC. (...) I do not believe that Alpha Team is at the same level as .town or .pirates. (mostly from (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | lugnet.alpha-team and lugnet.sports [was Re: I am not so sure on how to say this in here.]
|
| (...) [...] (...) I agree. Any admins listening??? (...) The .build hierarchy is for categories that are not official LEGO product lines. Official product lines get top-level groups. I think that the fact that there is no lugnet.sports has more to (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) And from 2001: (...) Hmm, I'm still number 3 but quite a few less posts... I wonder how much of this is my trying harder to stay out of off-topic.debate. I post mostly from NNTP, but I think NNTP posters get a X-Real-Life-Name added by Lugnet (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| The list used incorrect values for 2001, se a new and improved list here (moved to new thread for convinience): (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) Jude Beaudin 19 490 471 (...) The list used incorrect values for 2001, se a new and improved list here (moved to new thread for convinience): (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) The list used incorrect values for 2001, se a new and improved list here (moved to new thread for convinience): (URL) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | 2002 Rocket list!
|
| Hi all! I've made a list of the 2002 rockets, that is, the people that increased their posting the most. I used Dan's list of how many posts each person did in 2001 & 2002 and calculated the difference. To keep this post a little shorter (and my (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general) !
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) Oops, my mistake. Since I know I posted more than 1 message in 2001 I didn't twig that the first numerical column wasn't the difference!. (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) Yes, it has been pointed out to me Dan posted two versions of the 2001 list and I used the incorrect one. I'll see if I can rework the whole thing later today or in the weekend. Best, /Tobbe (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) I think you may have a problem with your information for 2001. I posted more than 19 times and I am pretty sure Larry posted more than the 225 times you reported for him. Jude (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) ... (...) ... (...) ... Tobbe, I'm not as big a rocket as you might suggest. I think that you may have used the wrong list from 2001. As I recall, Dan Boger posted two lists; the first one was incorrect. correct 2001 list (URL) Clark 193 (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) I'm not quite sure I follow you, but as I did the list I found _a_lot_ of people that either did not post at all or only a few posts in 2001 that had a fair amount of posts in 2002. Of course I took away everyone who posted less then 50 times (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) Mine too - I got 147 posts, and I only ever post using Outlook Express! Go Microsoft!!! (j/k) ;-) Cheers, Paul (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) What I find most bizarre is how consistent the majority of posters are, the number of us who are within 0 or 1 of last years total is freakish. I imagine this is mostly down to the amount of time we each have to surf Lugnet. Psi (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| (...) As a matter of fact I myself thought I'd be a good rocket (went from two posts to 21st place) and before I fell asleep last nigth I thought it would be cool to make a list with the biggest rockets from 2002. So I made that. Due to the fact I (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
| Wow. I jumped from being tied for last last year (with 1 post) (I'd just gotten my membership), to 20th this year (with 592 posts). With that rate of growth, I'll squash Larry's numbers by Ground Hog's Day. Happy New Year's, all. Bruce Hietbrink (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: lugnet.sports
|
| Whatever happened to this? This is still a needed forum - now more than ever. (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
