 | | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I'd be happy with .announce.moc. As you say, you get the choice with the view plain - us technic-heads have already had to get used to this with bionicle 8?/ and it's OK once you get used to it. Just means you've gotta individually check all (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GpIu2r.4zr@lugnet.com... (...) MOCs. (...) laws (...) The MOC posts in .announce continue despite Todd's word on it. Will Todd take futher action to enforce what he said? Is it (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Yep, this was suggested elsewhere in the thread and it has a lot of merit. My preference would be for build.announce as that keeps the announce tree low traffic. (yes, you could view .announce without subgroups but then you miss (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
Hello Larry, hello everybody, I would suggest to create a new group lugnet.announce.moc. Most of the postings some people find unappropriate for any of the other lugnet.announce.* groups could probably fit there ... Greetings Horst (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Allan Bedford writes: <mostly well considered and not disagreed to by me so I snipped it> except for this: (...) No, it *isn't* just my opinion... it seems to be the opinion of the person who wrote the charter. And he ought (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
