| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
Hmmm...mmm, Well I can't say I agree totally with everything being said here; I know I haven't been here as long as most of you, but I'll reply nonetheless. I still view LUGNET as the center of the lego universe, I come here everyday, read lot's, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) Here's one more. I'd be willing to dedicate at least two hours a day to curate lugnet.space as well as other tangential groups, and to coordinate my efforts with other curators. James' approach is excellent; which in a nutshell is to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
|
|
(...) Only for expressing the opinion, I think. (...) But then why do you support the mandate against profanity? I've assumed the goal of these rules is to make LUGNET a place where adults can do their thing and still be a place that parents are (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
|
|
For what it's worth, I don't thing Eduardo means any harm at all. I think he is just plain clueless. Afterall, it is not easy for a person with a different cultural and language background to understand what is acceptable and what is not. For (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) Gentlemen, I'm with you all on this one. Kevin put it all in perspective saying "how can one volunteer if there's no response when one tries?". Twice now I've asked for a pair of curatorships (.build.mecha and .org.us.lugola) in an attempt to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|