 | | Slowness
|
|
I authorised these on Friday (via e-mail) but they took until last night to appear: (URL) (mail at November 23, 2001 8:04 PM) (URL) (mail at November 23, 2001 7:53 PM) Scott A (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) I've had enough of this petty name-calling, I wish you would all grow up :) Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: but it (...) I'll skip it and wait for the movie. I wonder who will be cast as the lead characters? (Maybe they will choose animals? Silly me, the SPCA would have none of that!) -John FUT OT.fun (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) *Ouch* I just went through the most horrible part of LUGNET. I missed this whole part because of the nice filters on news.lugnet.com I stand corrected and will try to read everything before I answer to a post. The only reason I came across (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) All too obvious. I was actually reading admin.general to catch up on general administration items that happend over the Thanksgiving holiday, but it feels more like I'm reading a biography of an elementary school hall monitor.... -Duane (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) Mark - read lugnet.admin.general around this post. It should be obvious. Jason J Railton (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) First of all: Suz, I respect you and your role as LUGNET Admin. But I have to ask: what do you mean with this? I mean, we all play with LEGO, so growing up is part of the not-done thingy. Seriuosly though: what do you mean? Mark de Kock (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
I'm not going to bicker with you in the group. I'll discuss facts. But there is nothing to be gained by addressing the tosh below in this group. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling for banishment?
|
|
I'm not going to bicker with you in the group. I'll discuss facts. But there is nothing to be gained by addressing the garbage below. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
in article GnEx5o.DL7@lugnet.com, Scott A at eh105jb@mx1.pair.com wrote on 11/26/01 8:49 AM: (...) Yes. If they are spurious, they will speak for themselves. If you REALLY feel you have been harmed, then get a lawyer and sue for slander, or libel, (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
