 | | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Are you OK with an avalanche of "me too" posts like this one? Either that or maybe an enhancement tracker would be nice to have. (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | A little function I would like to see.
|
|
Ok, I hope this does not start an avalance of requests but I just thought that with all the new admins that I would make a small function request that I would like to be able to take advantage of. I would love to be able to define a sig (signature (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev (and 1 other group), Bram Lambrecht wrote: \> > heh, yah - put it on the member page under activity, or (...) heh, yah - except there are a lot of other things that need doing more :) *grin* Dan (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) It's just a SMOP(1) after all. But where is it on the priority list? In fact, can we SEE the priority list? Or even dynamically change it by voting for what changes we think are important? That would be neat. (although that too would require (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Hey, now that you're an admin, this is within your power, isn't it? :) --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) Duane, Thanks for pointing out exactly where I was going with my argument. He screwed up and got shot down for the language abuse. We can remember the lesson, move on, and all be better for it. -Dave (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Then you'd be wrong. -Dave (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) WOOHOO!!!! Not THAT would be a useful item here at LUGNET. Far better than Brickshelf's instructions database that is updated through 1997. Knowing what parts are in sets helps me decide what to buy and I know I'm not the only one who uses (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
We're also very happy to be on the team, and are very excited to be here. I hope y'all will be patient with us, since it will take a while to understand the code for LUGNET, which is a huge project. :) Dan (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Well, I'd rather not speak for Steve, but I can point you in some directions about him, specifically: (URL) for Dan and myself, let's see... We've been DB admins for the LUGNET Guide since June of 2000, we run (URL) (including the peeron inventories (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Congrats on the new positions. eric (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Welcome and congrats. For some of us folks who are a little rusty on our LUGNET history, maybe introductions/backgrounds from Steve, Dan, and Jennifer might be nice... what do you say, guys? Again, congrats! - Steve (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
I think that's on a to-do list somewhere. :) Jennifer (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) I think that there is a distinction, however small, between JAL's post and Matt's post. I don't want to get in to that though - I don't feel that it's constructive. The thing about Matt's post that I find offensive is the subject line. A (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) The good news is you're not bitter about it. :-) Why don't we move on... Jude (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Does this mean we may see links to Peeron inventories in the Lugnet Database in the near future? :) (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) It's hard to respond to a fortune cookie, but if you mean that this path leads away from past mistakes, I have a question for you: Is Jesse Alan Long still banned? I would love to hear that his posting ability was re-instated, and that Lugnet (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you didn't bother to actually read the thread I pointed to. eric (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Alright, I didn't want to jump into this one to continue a thread with a seemingly offensive title (which is worse than strting it, IMHO), but this is a bit much. Frustration over what Matt thought he saw happening was perfectly justified. I (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) My path leads forward. Please don't trip me. -Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
