 | | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
(...) Yes, you got that part right. (...) ??? Is this some kind of joke too? Where does eliticism enter here? You expressed bad form, people told you so. (...) It wasn't received as a joke, hence the reactions. (...) Of course I didn't notice, not (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
(...) reaaaaaaal dry or simplistic. im sorry. dont count on me posting much anymore due to a) elitists, b) NOT ONE PERSON can take a joke... and c) if you didnt notice, i XFUT to OT.fun. rick (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eat this!!!!!
|
|
"Rick Hallman" <legodude725@removeaol.com> skrev i meddelandet news:GK4JGt.HGB@lugnet.com... (...) With all due respect to the suffering Americans, I don't think this has anything to do with Lego, and it's certainly not following the rules for (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
|
|
(...) Is it time to put an end to this? Could Scott and Larry be banned from replying to each other for a trial period at least? just an idea, DaveL (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Building (brown)
|
|
(...) If the discussion was around how the module had bearing on the activities of other clubs, yes, otherwise no. (...) See above (...) No. Unless you somehow could tie it into the activities or operations of clubs. It's not enough to just say (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Building (brown)
|
|
(...) lugnet.trains.org? National and local train clubs/organizations for LEGO® enthusiasts: group formation, founding, planning, announcements, etc.; inter-group coordination and planning; general ideas, thoughts, inspirations, insights, (...) (23 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Building (brown)
|
|
(...) That's all well and good but the *post* is primarily about buildings. Review the trains.org charter. Review the building and building.arch charters. If everything that was tangentially related to train organisations was posted there it would (...) (23 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
|
|
(...) I would think that the authentication date would replace the authored date when publishing. Thanks for the (guess) explanation. -Rob. (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
|
|
(...) my guess is that while he wrote it on 13-sep-01, he didn't reply to the auth message until 2 hours ago, when the message was posted. does that make sense? :) Dan (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
|
|
(...) The date on this message is 13-Sep-01 and shows up on the web interface between 14-Sep messages. It shows up as a 13-Sep message via NNTP. What's up? -Rob. (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
