 | | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) Hi, I apologize for the lack of communication and delays in processing. Todd did in fact take a little time off and I'm filling in. In future, please feel free to mail me at suz@lugnet.com to get my direct attention. -Suz (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) I agree with Ben. I'm amazed that Todd is able to take care of this site. I would loose my mind trying to what he does. Each day this site grows bigger and bigger, and that takes more and more time. While I understand your frustration, you (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) that (...) Seconded. I also noticed that when I joined I went through a process of joining Pay Pal because they would pay five dollars towards the membership fee. When I update my member profile, I see that I still owe $5. Has anyone else (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
This may sound a little harsh, but I don't think some of you really understand what it takes to maintain a board in general, and a world-wide based board like this in particular.... I don't want to speak on behalf of Todd Lehman, but I am quite sure (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newest Members
|
|
(...) I'm not sure, but the last update took well over a month. There is a break in time between member #1105 and #1106 (May 25 to July 4). And after #1106 there are MANY members that "joined" on July 4. I applied for a membership on June 6 and it (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Newest Members
|
|
How often does the newest members bit on the LUGNET home page get updated? Thanks Carl (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) I haven't changed my opinion - didn't like it to start with and still don't - but I'll put up with it in order to be rid of the spoofer(s). I'm posting less because of it. (I read via newsreader and it adds (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
(...) I really liked the PGP option, but that never seemed to go anywhere. Allowing e-mail replies helped a lot - though it wouldn't be hard to cook something up with Procmail and Perl to get around it. Sooner or later, someone will probably do (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
(...) Roger that! It's been a few weeks now since it was introduced and we had a flurry of discussion. Are there folks who have changed their opinions significantly one way or the other? (I like it better than ever, but that's not a significant (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
|
|
agreed. i dont like faked id posts -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "John Hansen" <JohnBinder@aol.com> wrote in message news:GG9CJK.AFH@lugnet.com... (...) want (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
