 | | Re: Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!
|
|
(...) Out of all his spew there is one tidbit worth noting. It's when he said, effectively, "if you don't want to give me attention, just ignore me". Good advice. David, I suspect no one thinks any less of you because you had your ID swiped, or (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!
|
|
Unless I am missing something, I am starting to think Todd has been quiet on this for too long. Is there some sort of plan to exclude or bring Matthew back for good? Clearly the current state of affairs cannot continue indefinitely without doing (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!
|
|
(...) I'm still here, and I'm working to resolve the issue. Clearly we need a workable mechanism for authenticating email addresses. I've got some ideas and have spoken with people off-line about these. It won't be pretty. I've been generally quiet (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | The Problem (was Re: Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!)
|
|
(...) Todd, (et al) I'm worried about a technical solution to authentication problem. In fact, I'm a bit worried about whether we're solving the right problem at all. To me it seems the problem is not enforcing a ban on individuals, it's more a case (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Problem (was Re: Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!)
|
|
(...) Ross, Thanks for sharing your thoughts. -- Todd S. Lehman | LUGNET Admin <todd@lugnet.com> (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
