 | | Re: robotics sub-groups —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) No, lugnet.comp.lang would be any discussion about computer languages ('lugnet' implies that it should be LEGO-relevant, but it's not explicit). lugnet.robotics.lang would be better, I think. But Todd listed other possibilities which are (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: robotics sub-groups —Linc Smith
| | | | | Steve Bliss wrote (...) ***Whoops***, I meant "robotics" instead of "comp" in that suggestion. I agree that comp is NOT a good idea. A little usenet slip ;) LINC (25 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
