 | | Um, so why this new server? —Tim Rueger
|
| | | Hi, I know Todd's obviously put a lot of work into this, but from a content standpoint, how is this to be different from rec.toys.lego? I can see the organizational benefit, but I also like the "one big mess" aspect of browsing r.t.l. Just asking... (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | Why not?! --Todd (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) It's our belief that many people have drifted away from RTL over the years as it shifted slowly away from good old-fashioned building discussions (1993-94) into a more commercial/marketplace/auctions type of atmosphere (1995-98). We'd like to (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Wouter van Wageningen
|
| | | | | | | (...) Not to mention that I can reach this news-server through our firewall. My other server requires a local IP# Cheers, Wouter (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Cool! Unforunately, LarryP is having trouble getting here through his company's firewall. I might set things up to operate on two or more ports instead of just one. (...) I take it from "Wouter" and "wvw" that you are Wouter van Wageningen? (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Scott Smallbeck
|
| | | | | | | | | We access the internet using a proxy server at work and I will need to map a link to this newsgroup before I will be able to see it. Since I really do not need to be reading all of these messages during work, I will probably not set it up at the (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Scott Javoroski
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I'm pretty darn happy that I can reach it through my corporate firewall also, I wasn't able to reach it during the alpha testing phase from here... :( Scott (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | | | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message <36106f06.40943712@l...et.com>... (...) Does this mean I'll have a chance at winning a Space Monorail at auction? (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Depends on the rules of the auction :-)... I get here on weekends (dialing in through my ISP instead of via work). :-) But unless it's a 6990, you're safe, no doubt. I have 2 6993s, 4 6991s, and lots of goodies... at least 3 each of both (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Ed "Boxer" Jones
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Well I cannot access it through the firewalls at my office - even using netscape's new reader. Froze up my whole system. (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Wouter van Wageningen
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Yep, that's me. (...) It's Dutch, just like me. It sort of means brat, like Dennis the Menance. I got the nick-name while I was working at my first job. My boss used to call me that, for I was very 'Dennisy' in my approach to programming and (...) (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | X-Real-Life-Name header —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Okie dokie, I've got a mapping in the server now so that your real-life name is inserted automagically into the headers of the articles you post, for example: Xref: lugnet.com lugnet.general:75 Newsgroups: lugnet.general Path: (...) (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: X-Real-Life-Name header —Wouter van Wageningen
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) OK, I guess that the msg that made you post this should have had the Followup-To field set......... I'll try to remember that. ____ |oooo| Cheers, |oooo| Wouter ¯¯¯¯ (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Dennis de Bengel = Dennis teh Menace could be the reference... Jasper (26 years ago, 3-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Carolyn Drebert
|
| | | | | | | This is exactly why I like this better. I will tend to not even join discussions if I have to wade through so many posts to read the responses. Thanks, again, Todd. -- A A ( o o ) Carolyn (URL) ~ < Todd Lehman wrote in message (...) (26 years ago, 30-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —Jeff Thompson
|
| | | | | | (...) For one thing, the existance of LEGO oriented mailing lists indicate that there's a need for discussions outside of r.t.l already extant. Usually you don't even know that the mailing list exists until you read a reference to it. It will be (...) (26 years ago, 1-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Um, so why this new server? —George Sikora
|
| | | | As a "generalist" as oppesed to as "specialist, I like to scan all of the posting on RTL. A quick glance at the subject line can usually keep me from opening too many messages that I don't want or missing too many that I do want. That is a long way (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
