Subject:
|
Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:48:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
74 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > I was talking to Todd, claiming that his antiMS bias is so strong that it
> > > may be causing him to make bad technology decisions in some cases.
> >
> > Thanks. I'll watch out.
> >
> > Is there some point to this?
>
> And if you're going to make judgements about how Lugnet is being run, wouldn't
> a more appropriate place be lugnet.admin.general?
>
> eric
>
> FUT set accordingly. Dangit.
We seem to have been having a "followup war" in that different people set
followups in this thread to different places. I tend to agree with you that
.admin.general was the best, and I think I *did* set FUT .admin.general on
several (? at least one, anyway) in this large tree but they got set
elsewhere by responders so I gave up.
I missed that this branch was in .general... sorry about that, chief!
This tree is mostly not growing as fast any more, but the generic question
of what to do when different responders have different viewpoints about
where FUT belongs might be worth discussing (in a new tree).
or not.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
| (...) I haven't been following this thread, so I'll have to plead ignorance. I just happened to note these couple, and threw in my two cents. For the most part MS bashing probably (IMHO) belongs in off-topic.geek or at least off-topic.debate, but (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
