|
|
 | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) Ah, Larry, always throwing a few snipes in to Christianity, huh? I expected nothing less, that's all right. (...) Folks, all I responded to was Frank Filz (SP?) discussion about debate, and according to what he thought, I agreed with him. I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) The way it's written one could almost read it as he hopes that you two have a lot of fights with each other, rather a mean thing to wish so close to Winter Solstice festival, don't you think? :-) So I'm doubting *that* is what he meant. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) About what? --Todd (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) Can the two of you please take all of this offline to private email? --Todd (25 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Debate's current problem (was Re: Uselessness of .debate)
|
| (...) I read your other post, and you made some groovy assertions. I suppose I'm as guilty of "point-scoring" as anyone else, but I wasn't consciously doing it to amass points. Sometimes it seems to me simply polite to address each point in turn, (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
