To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8175 (-20)
  Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
 
Ahh, yes - you have discovered that some LDRAW elements have colors hard-coded into them. They therefore do not appear with the color specified, but rather with the colors embedded into the .dat file for them. :-) Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde (...) (26 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) G'day Eric, I find it interesting that you call this elitist. In a way I guess I can see your point, but I personally don't see it as a bad thing. When I first got on LUGNET (start of this year) I thought that all people posting to LUGNET had (...) (26 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) As did I...I think a day or two earlier. I didn't remove all my posts but two or three that were particularly sour. It's interesting how quickly we (humans) can blow up, even when we don't want to. That's probably what I dislike most about (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) One person said that, but I'm not sure how serious they were. A couple of other people hinted at it. Two or three people (I think two) said that they would set up a killfile. (...) I don't think they meant it as a threat. I certainly didn't (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
Interesting discussion. It just raised a parallel issue which gives us a precedent to look at. That precedent is auctions. Todd has made it quite clear that pointing to an auction website in a group which doesn't welcome auction posts is fine when (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) Which is a succinct way of saying that he was basically a jerk. :) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) I think you may have misunderstood why I mentioned your member number (note I didn't mention mine). I also don't think your number should necessarily indicate you have some sort of status or "power" here. I referenced it simply because I (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) Gee, Lar--why do I have the feeling that this isn't an entirely hypothetical example? 8^) Dave! (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) So would I. Of course, discussing it would imply the person with the negative opinion was around to discuss it. :D I'm really not saying that you should be forced to agree in any way with anything anyone says, or that you should not have the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes: <snip> (...) That statement I would not take as being a threat but like I said I don't know what people said to Todd privately and I assume there were many people writing Todd privately about the topic (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
 
(...) For the non-numeric among us: 0 - Black 1 - Blue 2 - Green 3 - Teal 4 - Red 5 - Dark Pink 6 - Brown 7 - Light Gray 8 - Dark Gray 9 - Light Blue 10 - Bright/Light Green 11 - Turquoise 12 - Scala Salmon (I'm winging it. This color is not a very (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
 
(...) These are great. Todd, might you have a few minutes to write a Random Part/Colour Generator like the Random Set Name Generator? Idea stimulants for CAD builders! By the way, these are nice for fountains: (URL) Heather -- Heather Patey Pirate (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) People seem to be suggesting, though, that one should not choose to voice that opinion. If person A can voice an opinion that persons B, C, and D find offensive (and to be honest - persons E, F, and G couldn't care less about) I'd say B, C, or (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) strongly (...) to (...) Well it wasn't *intended* as a witch hunt. More of a rhetorical question, because i'm not sure there *are* any people who still feel that someone should be tossed soley for opinions. <snip Mike's eloquent distinction (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) And/or perhaps in some cases overstated. Or overly stressed. (...) I sent Todd a few private e-mails on this subject (most of which dealt pretty specifically with apologizing for blowing my top and asking him to remove my emotionally charged (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) So would I. No one ever said you couldn't choose who to like and who not to like. (...) Actually, if I felt that way, yeah, I would be ashamed of myself. (...) Just because he may have been here on Lugnet doesn't mean you *must* associate with (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) Wow, what a loaded question, especially given what seems(ed) like a reverse- witch-hunt. I'd like to state first that I realized Friday that I got WAY too worked up about this and posted some things that were, in some cases, petty and (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) Actually I'm not including myself to that a few remaining, but in case of any doubt, here is my reasoning, in which I tried to word it as much clear as possible: (URL) there is any flaws, replies would be really appreciated. Selçuk (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) I just wanted to add that I agree with Eric J. once again. I know I and a few others were playing a bit of devils advocate durring this discussion. Thats mostly because I thought several peoples reasoning for banishment were misguided. There (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> That rocks, man! Way cool. Thanks, Steve and Todd. (...) waterfall in a diorama. (GMLTC didn't have a waterfall in the last layout for lack of trans blue bricks, and for lack of place to put it) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR