To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8172
8171  |  8173
Subject: 
Re: My Stance
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:16:32 GMT
Viewed: 
8187 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Kingsley writes:
> There was one other thing that bothered me durring the discussion however
> and that is the fact that it seems some people decided to tell Todd
> privately that if Matthew was not banished that they would leave.

One person said that, but I'm not sure how serious they were.  A couple of
other people hinted at it.  Two or three people (I think two) said that they
would set up a killfile.


> Because this was done
> privately I can't quote word for word but it all sounds like threats to me
> and we don't need that here.

I don't think they meant it as a threat.  I certainly didn't see it that way.
It was preceded by "It's your call, but I also want to say that I would be
likely to pack up and leave if he stays and continues to act this way" (this
is from memory -- not a direct quote -- and paraphrased) and I think it was
intended as something to take into consideration -- something to illustrate
the level of frustration.


> I still feel that some people need to learn how to
> disagree (politely of course).  We are not all going to agree all the time
> and trying to force a viewpoint with threats of any kind is not the right
> way to go about it.  Sometimes you just have to agree to disagree and be
> done with it.

I agree, and I'm no saint on this point, either.  I also like what ScottA
wrote earlier about trying not to say things online that you wouldn't say to
someone in person.  (That advice assumes a generally polite personality to
start with, and probably won't work so well with rude dispositions, but I
think most people are generally polite in real life, as long as their mad
buttons aren't pushed.  :-)


> Finally I would like to say that I am not in any way sad to see Matthew go.
> I just wanted to try and do my part to ensure that he was banished for the
> right reasons.

I am personally sad that someone has been thrown out who put up space models
that I really enjoyed (especially the weaponry sections).  I would still feel
that way even if the commotion had been 10x what it was.

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My Stance
 
(...) I just wanted to add that I agree with Eric J. once again. I know I and a few others were playing a bit of devils advocate durring this discussion. Thats mostly because I thought several peoples reasoning for banishment were misguided. There (...) (26 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR