 | | Re: A reixamination of what happened.
|
|
(...) Sign... I wish I can also do or say anything and expect others to take it easily if I got "very angry". You must be very special to have such privilege. (...) And people can't take your remarks on your public site personally because? (...) And (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd! Admin and owner
|
|
(...) Well I don't know how specific you want but without nameing names I will try. I also assume you want specifics as to what I don't like about the reasoning for banning Matthew not reasoning for not liking Matthew. It is my feeling that there (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
G'day Mike, I've already posted my personal points on this issue: (URL) I'll reinforce them for my part... (...) Why should the ToS of this site be relevant to off-site content? If the message posting the link (exluding the link itself) abides by (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: hackin the faq
|
|
(...) Would'a replied earlier if I saw it!! (...) You're doing a very good job (and great for the community)! I'm sure many will appreciate it, whether old-timers or newbies. (...) Good idea! [..] (...) Definitely! You might want to have a cross-ref (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
(...) way? (...) I'd agree with the argument. And I think I'd go one step further. If I maintain a site at www.isecretlyhatetodd.com and I never mention it here, I'm not sure I should be held accountable ToS-wise if someone stumbles across it and (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I don't mean even a bit by the above paragraph it was all you, and the flame war is not a big thing to me as alone. The paragraph is just a chronology, so I put it back to it's original form. (...) Read below. Besides, bet I care even a bit (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
Sorry for the malformed subject, it feels like it's 2 AM to me. Something has been nagging at me about one aspect of the latest... I think I want to recant some of my own words, and see if some other people do too. At least a little. Maybe it's a (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A reixamination of what happened.
|
|
(...) You never were, and still aren't, in my mind. What you put on your site led me and countless others to the personal conclusion that you are a jerk, but that's a completely separate issue from judgment of what you did or didn't do here on this (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A reixamination of what happened.
|
|
(...) While I would certainly agree that one person with a petty vendetta does not make a "huge conspiracy", if the idea that you were purposely out to harm the online LEGO community is "bs", how do you explain this post: (URL) seems pretty clear to (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Not accurate, no. Beside the point, nobody who wrote me was upset by your views -- only by your attitude and immature behavior level .space and .off-topic.debate. --Todd (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
