 | | Re: My Stance
|
|
LUGNET has many things, and it needs many things. However, I don't feel it needs "loathing animosity" of any kind. I may be wrong? Scott A (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Much of the canceling was done by the AUKins and other groups who wanted to try and delete my net history. They would leave in only the parts they wanted. Although I think some of those may have been the cause of someone in the Lego community (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
Lorbaat wrote in message ... (...) it's (...) felt (...) two (...) LEGO (...) do we (...) can (...) As (...) people (...) exist. (...) and (...) never (...) (trust (...) people (...) the (...) full (...) of (...) find a (...) pain (...) internet. (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) word" (...) or (...) It's (...) Sorry I did not read them, and still have not. I'll accept your word for it. Scott A (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) This issue aside, I don't think it is acceptable to use "bad words" here, and I doubt most people here do either. I don't swear in front of my kids, or anyone else’s. Kids do read Lugnet. Sure Matt did a bad thing. But others fanned his (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Colorized Images (was: Partsref Update)
|
|
Todd, I just pushed the first set of files over to the ftp server. The file is imgld0.zip, it contains black images for all parts. Take a look at this, let me know if this is a good format (ie, makes it the least amount of work for you to publish (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Even more pertinent, glancing over the three posts in question for the "f word" (well, two, since one is cancelled) will show that they are about whether or not the word is offensive... in other words, they were talking about whether or not (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Sorry for being ignorant from time to time, but I'll ignore your well worded schweety talk. I have just a question, though. You already made your "point". You proved that we are a bunch of pathetic losers of an evil community, so (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref Update
|
|
(...) Steve, Maybe you're not the right person, and this may not be the right place to ask - but could one of you who are the wizards of LDraw please correct the "official" description for part number 30382 (the brown wing piece from the droid (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Scott, do you think this is an appropriate example? I never care much some f words in a post, since I'm using bad language in my everyday life, (but still trying to not use them in my post here since TOS banned them) but is this the key (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
Todd, I can understand your intention to being fair, but do you really think this is necessary for this case? Do you really believe that someone could have an acceptable excuse and/or explanation for such a situation? I suggest letting him scrawl (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Matt, You're going to take this as some kind of slam, or some kind of flame, but it's not intended as one, really. Try to keep that in mind as you read it. I've read pretty much every post resulting from your initial posts of a few days ago. I (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref Update
|
|
(...) At this point, it's all over but the zipping. But I do plan on making some improvements, so it can be done as a delta-process, instead of rerunning the whole show for each parts update. I also plan on packaging it up, so anyone can run it. (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
Scott A wrote: <snip> (...) Scott, actually I like some grinding gears just inside some other regular ones, so I like reading your posts, but MM is completely out of any comparison I think (actually I'm sure). It's not the just this or that post (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, John Robert-Blaze Kanehl writes: Todd, I respect that you have the final "judgement" in this case. I have accepted that from day one here on Lugnet, so be it. Discussion has gone on long enough, almost as long or longer than (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I empathize with you completely. When I came to LUGNET in March I also had a lot of ideas that I was all excited about, and most of the time I was told that something was already in the works, there wasn't any interest, or whatever. I do think (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks...
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2prp1.719@lugnet.com... (...) from (...) post (...) 6:30 (...) I thougt it had to do with old crappy MS-mail protocol together with an SMTP-gate at the mailserver? Or maybe not. (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2ps0v.7xy@lugnet.com... (...) Todd is (...) month/week? (...) ALL (...) nice (...) this (...) devil's (...) to (...) is (...) glossed (...) was (...) about (...) them by (...) Well (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
