Subject:
|
Re: My Stance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:23:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
ssgore@superonline.com*avoidspam*
|
Viewed:
|
2781 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott A wrote:
>
> Well if you think it will be productive, perhaps we should crawl over
> everyone's past, and use it against them. Perhaps we should draw up a table
> of the 10 most inflammatory posts for both here and RTL... and have those
> guys tossed out too. I have just done a reach on LUGNET for:
>
> b*st*rd - 35 hits
> f*ck hits 3 hits
>
> Lets start by having everyone of those posters thrown out of LUGNET?
>
> Scott A
Scott, do you think this is an appropriate example? I never care much
some f words in a post, since I'm using bad language in my everyday
life, (but still trying to not use them in my post here since TOS banned
them) but is this the key actually? Do you really believe that he got
the response and banned here just he use some bad words in his posts?
Are just he was a bad person some time ago?
Please go and READ THE ENTIRE THREAD both here and RTL. For a summary,
he started a thread suggesting that he will built a new web site,
someone like brickshelf, but better than that. Some other people there
replied him as brickshelf is not that bad. And from this point (his
second post), he started acting like a fully configured *** ****. The
dialog between him and a German guy (Hoerst Lehner?) is especially
worthy of note.
Then of course he got the response that he deserved, then with the hate
of it he placed a document in his web site, and just to have a live
"evidence" that supports his sick thoughts about how evil we are as a
community, he KNOWINGLY started this flame war. And this is not my
comments, he said all this things.
So the ENTIRE thing is RECENT, including RTL incident, by his own words.
I consider him as a total waste of terran resources, not just resources
here in Lugnet.
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Even more pertinent, glancing over the three posts in question for the "f word" (well, two, since one is cancelled) will show that they are about whether or not the word is offensive... in other words, they were talking about whether or not (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) This issue aside, I don't think it is acceptable to use "bad words" here, and I doubt most people here do either. I don't swear in front of my kids, or anyone else’s. Kids do read Lugnet. Sure Matt did a bad thing. But others fanned his (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Stance
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2ps0v.7xy@lugnet.com... (...) Todd is (...) month/week? (...) ALL (...) nice (...) this (...) devil's (...) to (...) is (...) glossed (...) was (...) about (...) them by (...) Well (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
122 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
