 | | Re: Partsref Update
|
|
(...) Steve, Maybe you're not the right person, and this may not be the right place to ask - but could one of you who are the wizards of LDraw please correct the "official" description for part number 30382 (the brown wing piece from the droid (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Scott, do you think this is an appropriate example? I never care much some f words in a post, since I'm using bad language in my everyday life, (but still trying to not use them in my post here since TOS banned them) but is this the key (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
Todd, I can understand your intention to being fair, but do you really think this is necessary for this case? Do you really believe that someone could have an acceptable excuse and/or explanation for such a situation? I suggest letting him scrawl (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) Matt, You're going to take this as some kind of slam, or some kind of flame, but it's not intended as one, really. Try to keep that in mind as you read it. I've read pretty much every post resulting from your initial posts of a few days ago. I (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Partsref Update
|
|
(...) At this point, it's all over but the zipping. But I do plan on making some improvements, so it can be done as a delta-process, instead of rerunning the whole show for each parts update. I also plan on packaging it up, so anyone can run it. (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
|
Scott A wrote: <snip> (...) Scott, actually I like some grinding gears just inside some other regular ones, so I like reading your posts, but MM is completely out of any comparison I think (actually I'm sure). It's not the just this or that post (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, John Robert-Blaze Kanehl writes: Todd, I respect that you have the final "judgement" in this case. I have accepted that from day one here on Lugnet, so be it. Discussion has gone on long enough, almost as long or longer than (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
(...) I empathize with you completely. When I came to LUGNET in March I also had a lot of ideas that I was all excited about, and most of the time I was told that something was already in the works, there wasn't any interest, or whatever. I do think (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks...
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2prp1.719@lugnet.com... (...) from (...) post (...) 6:30 (...) I thougt it had to do with old crappy MS-mail protocol together with an SMTP-gate at the mailserver? Or maybe not. (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My Stance
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2ps0v.7xy@lugnet.com... (...) Todd is (...) month/week? (...) ALL (...) nice (...) this (...) devil's (...) to (...) is (...) glossed (...) was (...) about (...) them by (...) Well (...) (26 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
