 | | Re: Set Links (was Re: "Buy The Brick")
|
|
(...) oh, it's been around for a while... (look at my sig :) also, try <set:8880 Cool set> too! (type < set : 8880 more text here, and a '>' ) :) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Set Links (was Re: "Buy The Brick")
|
|
(...) Cute trick. Can we all do that, or is that a SysAdmin perk? :-) SRC (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
|
|
Hi All ! I am becoming Lugnet member soon (I sent the money to Todd and I'm waiting) :-)) !!! Since I know that all Lugnet members are buying/selling /trading Lego among themselves (and the other people (non-members) I think it would be good idea if (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: FTX example source
|
|
(...) Not as one page, but you can get at the raw FTX code by appending '.ftx'[1] to the end of each page and looking at them one by one, for example: (3 URLs) etc. --Todd [1] or using index.ftx in the case of a trailing slash (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | FTX example source
|
|
Would it be possible to publish the FTX source to (URL) (which really means the source to all of the components, not just the transclusion source)? It's a pretty good guide, but a few things that appear doable don't appear to be written up anywhere. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: advanced search options?
|
|
(...) Here's the best answer I can give for now: (URL) How do I tell the search function to return only those posts (...) There isn't a way to search that way. These aren't captured by the current indexer. --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
|
|
(...) Benjamin may not have control over what mailer his employer uses, but he certainly has control over whether or not his messages appear threaded. If he posts using software that works correctly, his messages will appear threaded. If he posts (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
|
|
Now hold up a sec! Whilst I agree with Todd, berating Benjamin over something he has no control over won't actually accomplish anything. He has stated, previously, that he has no control over what the server admins do on their machines, and I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: hackin the faq
|
|
And as the Oops page notes, I really meant: (URL) Clark" <cary@corp.nospamwebtv.net> wrote in message news:G28Jsz.BFu@lugnet.com... (...) question, (...) The (...) on (...) for (...) is (...) made (...) transclusion[3] (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | hackin the faq
|
|
I've spent a few moments paying around with the LUGNET FAQ in FTX. Starting with (URL) (the batch that Jeremy Sproat created some time ago) I've put a whopping total of three of them here: (URL) tried to preserve the original FAQ entries content, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
|
