 | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Jennifer L. Boger
|
| | | (...) ahh.... at least they have that one little thing that means so much to me... FDIC insured. :) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) that (...) Is this debate flamebait? Or sarcasm The FDIC needs to do risk based underwriting instead of charging all banks the same rates. Online banks with lax security should have to pay higher premiums. FUT .debate if you must (seems (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) with (...) allowing (...) I'm not surprised you take that tack, and I agree although from a different POV. Does anyone remember FSLIC? When the Savings and Loan mess broke, the insuring agency (FSLIC) was merged with FDIC to keep the insurance (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) You're absolutely spot on. I thought what the banks lobbied to do to the NCUA was the highest degree of larceny and was relieved when it failed. Believe it or not most of my day to day non investment money is in Credit Unions, I am a big fan (...) (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
