 | | Re: Loading of Lugnet
|
| (...) unavailable" (...) Which is interesting! ...but fairly unreadable via the web interface unless i paste all the text into a monospaced editor. :-) I'm not sure there's a good solution to that short of extending FTX capability to all posts or (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Loading of Lugnet
|
| (...) shouldn't this be set on the posting side? either with a <mono></mono> tag, or with a checkbox ("This post should be displayed with a monospace font"). The tag is better, since email/news posters could still use it... but the checkbox is (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Loading of Lugnet
|
| (...) Using the "View raw message" link (just above the "Reply" icon) will show you the message in monospace. I'd rather not see FTX allowed in posts, because newsreaders won't know what to do with it. The web interface is very nice, but I still (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | RE: Loading of Lugnet
|
| (...) "View Raw Message" (right above "Reply") is probably a better way, Lar. (URL) Lambrecht BXL34@po.cwru.edu (URL) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Loading of Lugnet
|
| (...) Did you try clicking the "View Raw Message" link...? (...) Maybe some kind of 'X-Foo' header saying to force monospace... --Todd (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Loading of Lugnet
|
| (...) That's a good way, 'cause it's easy to set from a newsreader too. (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Loading of Lugnet
|
| (...) Ah. Right there in front of my nose all the time. Thanks (...) Indeed. Kind of what I was driving at, or at least that's the story I am sticking to. ++Lar (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
