| |
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> Brad said he appreciates the swift action and feels it is indicative of good
> relations between LEGO and the community and welcomes suggestions as to how
> LEGO can handle such situations in the future.
My primary suggestion is to start with the person who posted the
information, rather than talking to Todd first. Don't send a threatening
legal letter, but nicely say that Lego prefers to keep that information
secret, and and ask the poster to please delete the message and post a
retraction.
If that doesn't work, *then* talk to Todd. Going to him first puts him in a
non-fun situation, and it can make the original poster (who isn't
intentionally being bad, but rather just being excited about Lego's
products) feel censored.
Of course, if that doesn't work, there are stricter options available. But
why start with them?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I just received an email reply from Brad to my earlier message to him today. He reiterated that the original request was a formal legal request and noted that he could not give permission for me to post the contents of the message. He said (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
