 | | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them? —Shiri Dori
| | | | XP .db.inv (...) <snip> I agree. Hmmm... I'm thinking something along the lines of slightly changing the charter for .db.inv (or alternatively, creating a new group). If the charter was changed from... (...) to, for example... : lugnet.db.inv: : (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them? —Shiri Dori
| | | | | | Uh... duh. I said XP, but didn't. :-) (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.db.inv)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them? —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) You didn't mention FUT, so I'm ignoring this bit. (...) I'd rather not see db.inv's charter changed. I think a new group would be better. Actually, the true, proper solution is a queryable database. Maybe that's why Todd Lehman is staying out (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them? —Shiri Dori
| | | | | (...) True - but that would take a lot of combined effort. The question is, do we need a temporary solution *until* there's a permanent, searchable db? (...) Uh, probably he has other things on his mind right now, see (URL) (...) Yeah - they don't (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
