 | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) I don't think that Lego would appreciate such a change. It wasn't their intention. (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) ... and, if true, why do you think that would be? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | (...) Perhaps because official sponsership or endorsement would cause more headaches than the occasional no-strings-attached gift. LEGO as a company do it all the time - they might send out a K8 to a LEGOfest, organise local events; they have a (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes: <snipped well said reply/explanation> (...) A capital idea, would that it only would take hold. I for one am baffled why this thread has went on so long on such a tiny point that seems so stunningly (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stick in the mud... —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Well, I think I said -- and I think it's obvious. They don't want any of the legal responsibilities that would come with an endorsement/sponsorship relationship. (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
