 | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I just spent 5 minutes poring over the magazine (I may have missed something, admittedly) and the only disclaimers I spotted were on page 16 (the ad for the new story books) which said: "LEGO is a registered trademark belonging to the LEGO (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Thanks for the scour & add'l info. --Tood (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Soon as I pressed fire, I found another one... page 14 has the Lucasfilm standard disclaimer/assertion. ((C) Lucasfilm Ltd. & TM. All Star Wars elements are... <you know the rest>) The main point is I don't think there is any statement about (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine —Aaron West
|
| | | | (...) elements (...) Pardon me, but do you think the sloppiness has to do with the mag being targeted at children? Perhaps the LEGO execs in "The Department Dealing With This Sort Of Thing" did not really have anymore than a browsing/passing working (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) Heh.. but you shouldn't hafta be good at spotting stuff like that. (BTW, you might wanna take a lawyer with you the next time you buy a car or make your "Greatest Hits" CD ;-) But it is their job to be good at displaying stuff like that. Maybe (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
