Subject:
|
Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 May 2000 02:47:38 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm+ihatespam+.org
|
Viewed:
|
414 times
|
| |
|
|
John Rudy <tjjohn12@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
> use the Lego logo, under the fair play clause, but
> then use your [Todd's] private property, I would
> say that you should demand a published appology
> (sp?) in Mania Mag.
I certainly wouldn't suggest that. I think that someone thought (perhaps a
bit misguidedly, but honestly I don't think *too* misguidedly) that they
were doing something cool -- something that we (including Todd and Suzanne)
would all appreciate.
I think that (despite a generally very nice attitude) Lego has in some cases
[1] been overharsh in their attitude. But that doesn't mean that LUGnet
should follow the bad example!
[1] examples on request. *grin*
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) I am in complete agreement with Matt here. I think that someone at some level thought they were doing something cool- whether the artist threw it in on his own, or he drew in a computer and someone inserted the screenshot, or an editor (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) That was the first thing I thought. I would tell them they can't just wave that sort of thing around, they are Being so Hypocritical! They say we can't use the Lego logo, under the fair play clause, but then use your [Todd's] private property, (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
