Subject:
|
Re: Ratings thrown out; changed to Highlighting (was: Re: the latest news)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Apr 2000 15:27:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2082 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
<snip>
> Thomas: First, thanks for your comments (I don't know if I've thanked you
> directly yet). Second, things have just been "peeled" way back to their bare
> essentials. The underlying system is almost the same, but it's got a
> completely new skin -- hopefully one which replaces discomfort with appeal.
Well, thank you and the community for having such a detailed and invloved
discussion and consideration of the system. I never really expected this sort
of response; I suppose that a lot of other people weren't 100% happy with the
rating system as it was. This new system is better, I think. If it serves
your purposes and a majority of the other members are happy with it also,
that's great.
<snip>
> Thomas, have a look now -- if you're still with us -- this is basically how
> it turned out. No more 40's, no more 60's, no more 100's, no more 0's.
> Things not marked as noteworthy (i.e., Highlight or Spotlight) sit pristinely
> unmarred.
I'm still here. I had thought of posting a message during the first few days
of the old article rating system but held off until I could really think about
what it was that bugged me about it. When I did post, I felt better for having
expressed my opinions...wasn't expecting any real in-depth discussions to take
place, though. To tell the truth...I'm a little embarrased seeing my name in
the announce group...I want everyone to know that apparently a lot of people
felt the old system was not working for them...was I responsible for tipping
the first dominoe over? Yikes.
--
Thomas Main
main@appstate.edu
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
75 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
