Subject:
|
Re: Article rating (was: Re: the latest news)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:03:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2611 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> [...]
> Well, maybe it's not something for you then. (Certainly, it's not for
> everyone, because it does take a bit of time and concentration sometimes.)
Yikes, I gotta watch my wording. There's nothing to read between the lines
there -- those are two separate statements. I realise that rating takes time
and that not everyone has time or wants to spend it.
> What if, instead of giving out 0's and 100's, you could give out either a
> 25 or a 75? (Or some other pair?) Would you find that less intimidating?
Intimidating was a poor word choice... I mean, would you find that more
inviting (or less unpleasant)?
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Article rating (was: Re: the latest news)
|
| (...) Probably depends on how quickly they can rate articles. Through the website, it's a little cumbersome to give input on everything -- a lot of scrolling and mouse-clicking and waiting, etc. But using a custom newsreader client, it can be as (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
75 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
