Subject:
|
Re: the latest news
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:10:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1679 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Tom McDonald writes:
> > So that's my 2 cents. I find it particularly ironic that Thomas's article is
> > currently (as of this reading) rated 80.
>
> And.. it's a subject actually having very little to do with Lego or its
> products. If such a rating system is intended as its heart to display/help us
> find "really good" or "important" postings about Lego stuff, then Thomas'
> article shows that such a system can be used to highlight other subjects too.
Short note: in the temporary "top 40" page Todd put up, at least 50% (if not
more, I didn't count) of the posts were related to the discussion about the
rating. That's too bad, because it shouldn't be (AFAI gathered from Todd's POV
on what ratings should tell us).
-Shiri
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) Except for the fact that the message-group filter isn't applied there, it's actually working perfectly well, IMHO. The ratings are, in the final analysis, recommendations-to-read. If the original message and its replies are getting high (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: the latest news
|
| (...) For a few days I was thinking that too. But then I realized "I don't care," and also "I have no idea who rated this" -- they could be out to lunch for all I know, either for the duration of rating my article, or permanently. Or they could be (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
75 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
