 | | Decisions (Was: Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria) —Richard Franks
| | | | (...) I'm just advocating objectivity and consideration, rather than optimism. I trust that Todd put a lot of individual thought into the original system, but that didn't stop confusion and peoples feelings getting hurt. The replacement should be (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Decisions (Was: Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria) —Dan Boger
| | | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes: <snip> (...) what if there was a group .admin.server to discuss and test new features? That way, we'll move this traffic from .admin.general, (since I agree that it doesn't really belong here), and (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Decisions (Was: Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria) —Richard Franks
| | | | | | | (...) I think something like admin.server would be useful, at the moment normal admin.general traffic is getting drowned. Maybe admin.playground would convey the testing-ground message? (...) At the moment, members have cookies that tell LUGNET to (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Arthur
| | | | | | |
