 | | Re: LUGNET getting too complex? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) I imagine that when Todd gets around to making the web site able to keep track of which messages you've read, this feature will be available there too. But I don't think that's going to be available for a while. :( (This is one of many reasons (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET getting too complex? —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) I think it already does that - if you rate a message, it'll appear as rated by you in all the groups it's been crossposted to (with the little red arrow by the rating)... So all you need to do it rate each message you read ;) :) Dan (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET getting too complex? —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | Dan Boger wrote in message <38FF7F13.BA000A27@g...wn.edu>... (...) Another alternative for keeping messages marked as READ using web interface is to set the history file setting for a longer amount of time. I have mine in Netscape set at 80 days. I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET getting too complex? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, this is exactly why I don't see that as an option. I regularly read lugnet from three different systems, and infrequently from others. (25 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET getting too complex? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Which, if I understand correctly, is no longer available, since you can't rate "No Opinion" any more. ++Lar (25 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
