Subject:
|
Re: Lost Instructions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:02:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
782 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > m/^[Rr][Ee]:\s*/
>
> m/^Re:\s+/i
>
> ?
Ya, that oughtta work too. :)
Say, I just remembered one thing from cc:Mail -- it puts (or used to -- not
sure if it's still the case today) the reply depth count in square brackets
between "Re" and ":", i.e.:
Re: blah blah blah
Re[2]: blah blah blah
Re[3]: blah blah blah
Re[4]: blah blah blah
etc.
So something like
m/^Re(?:\[\d+\]):\s*/i
might be even safer, since this would be for broken clients in the first
place, and cc:Mail is-was about as broken as one can get. :-)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lost Instructions
|
| (...) just for efficiancy's sake, you shouldn't put a /s* at the end - it's not doing anything at all, is it? if there's anything that matches the /s class, it'll just take longer to complete the match, but if there's no /s at the end, it'll still (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
