 | | Re: Top-N article list adjusted for article-age —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) addition to time value, takes the NUMBER of ratings into account. To my way of thinking 2 articles both rated 90 aren't quite the same if one is rated 90 by 5 and the other by 50. Just something to ponder. ++Lar (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Top-N article list adjusted for article-age —Scott Arthur
| | | | | (...) [...] (...) I'm with you on this. This is the only real problem with the system as it stands - not enough readers are rating the posts. Scores on post with only one rating are of little value (to me) - especially when the single score is 0 or (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
