 | | Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message) —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) I think you'll be able to get that from the message headers, when you look it up... but most cases the message when you read it first will have a rating of 50 - assuming you get it as soon as it's posted, no one would have had a chance to rate (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm -- is that a planned feature? Current messages don't seem to have an X-Rating (hmmm, that sounds kinda funny) unless I am missing something. (Always possible!) Anyway, that would be plenty good for me. 1) I don't tend to keep my (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) As far as I know (haven't checked in the past 5 hours) it's not there yet - but Todd mentioned adding it to the avid.cgi at some point. (...) nod, that'll work for you. For what I'm planning to do, the spooling process will run all the time, (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
