 | | Re: New feature: Article rating —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) I was thinking about this the other night a bit, and I think it could be made to work. If you're willing to have it assume that you'll read anything it shows you, and you're willing to have a "mark unread" button, then that could end up being (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New feature: Article rating —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) YES, I'll take a fast, possibly inaccurate way to mark read and a slow but guaranteed accurate way to unmark read. I mark read a lot more than I unmark. (...) A "nested all" tree is what I just made up to mean what you get when you press the (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New feature: Article rating —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Ah, YES! That's the wording I was looking for! Thank you -- well said! (...) OK, roger that. (...) OK, thanks for clarifying. (...) That's odd. No, I haven't seen it. I wonder if it's overflowing some form size or something in the browser? (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New feature: Article rating —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) This was against the Tree That Shall Not Be Named for fear of stirring it up again, at the time I think it was about 180 or so, and i had rated maybe 30 or them. I went through and rated every single post. In some cases I changed existing (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
