Subject:
|
Re: New feature: Article rating
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:37:47 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2118 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> I was thinking about this the other night a bit, and I think it could be made
> to work. If you're willing to have it assume that you'll read anything it
> shows you, and you're willing to have a "mark unread" button, then that could
> end up being a lot faster than having to explicitly mark things read one by
> one. (Kinda like the theory on setting a simple digital alarm clock -- one
> fast-forward button and one slow-backward button.)
YES, I'll take a fast, possibly inaccurate way to mark read and a slow but
guaranteed accurate way to unmark read. I mark read a lot more than I unmark.
> Say again? (I remember the other subthread but what do yo umean by "to rate
> nested all trees" and "upper bound on"?)
A "nested all" tree is what I just made up to mean what you get when you press
the "entire thread on one page/ nested _all_ " url. Upper bound on ability is
that I suspect if you can wait it out to display a tree with 200 posts in it,
if you go through and rate all of them and press update ratings, it doesn't
work. I'm wondering if you have seen that behavior (it's hard to reproduce, you
need to be willing to re-rate a bumch of posts to see if it took)...
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) Ah, YES! That's the wording I was looking for! Thank you -- well said! (...) OK, roger that. (...) OK, thanks for clarifying. (...) That's odd. No, I haven't seen it. I wonder if it's overflowing some form size or something in the browser? (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) I was thinking about this the other night a bit, and I think it could be made to work. If you're willing to have it assume that you'll read anything it shows you, and you're willing to have a "mark unread" button, then that could end up being (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
