Subject:
|
Re: New feature: Article rating
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 02:05:04 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1739 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Which clearly means Todd's sw knows articles we've read, if we've rated them.
> Let's extend that to knowing ALL articles we've read. That enables a lot of
> better browsing options. I would be willing to somehow mark articles as read
> (if we can figure out an easy way) even if I decided against rating them...
>
> As I said a while back if you show me a tree(nested all, not the dots tree)
> view it may be reasonable to assume i read the whole tree even if I didn't
> rate all the articles
I was thinking about this the other night a bit, and I think it could be made
to work. If you're willing to have it assume that you'll read anything it
shows you, and you're willing to have a "mark unread" button, then that could
end up being a lot faster than having to explicitly mark things read one by
one. (Kinda like the theory on setting a simple digital alarm clock -- one
fast-forward button and one slow-backward button.)
> And I never did hear back about whether there was an upper bound on ability
> to rate nested all trees... or else i forgot
Say again? (I remember the other subthread but what do yo umean by "to rate
nested all trees" and "upper bound on"?)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) YES, I'll take a fast, possibly inaccurate way to mark read and a slow but guaranteed accurate way to unmark read. I mark read a lot more than I unmark. (...) A "nested all" tree is what I just made up to mean what you get when you press the (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New feature: Article rating
|
| (...) Which clearly means Todd's sw knows articles we've read, if we've rated them. Let's extend that to knowing ALL articles we've read. That enables a lot of better browsing options. I would be willing to somehow mark articles as read (if we can (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
