 | | Re: Thread scoring —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) how about saying "avg score 75 (1 out of 500 rated)"? :) Dan (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Thread scoring —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) score (...) 75 (...) No, that's fine, what I was driving at was that I would not add up the averages and divide by the number of posts, I'd add up the individual ratings and divide by the number of ratings... see the diff? Or were you talking (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thread scoring —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) heh, that was exactly what I meant by average of rated posts - not all posts in the thread. :) Dan (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thread scoring —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) rated (...) averages (...) divide (...) STILL not sure we're on the same page. Suppose we have 3 posts. One got 5 ratings (plus the dummy) and has an average of 75 (dummy 50, 100, 100, 100, 50, 50) One got 1 rating (plus the dummy) and has an (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thread scoring —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) that's exactly what I meant. Add up all the ratings made by humans, and divide it by the number of human ratings. :) Dan (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
