 | | Thread scoring
|
| is it possible, and worthwhile to have a thread score? Have a thread score be the average score of _rated_ posts in that thread? Just wondering... :) Dan (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread scoring
|
| (...) That would be cool! --Todd (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread scoring
|
| (...) Weighted average? a post rated 75 by 5 should contribute more than one rated 75 by 1, no? I dunno. ++Lar (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread scoring
|
| (...) how about saying "avg score 75 (1 out of 500 rated)"? :) Dan (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread scoring
|
| (...) score (...) 75 (...) No, that's fine, what I was driving at was that I would not add up the averages and divide by the number of posts, I'd add up the individual ratings and divide by the number of ratings... see the diff? Or were you talking (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread scoring
|
| (...) heh, that was exactly what I meant by average of rated posts - not all posts in the thread. :) Dan (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread scoring
|
| (...) rated (...) averages (...) divide (...) STILL not sure we're on the same page. Suppose we have 3 posts. One got 5 ratings (plus the dummy) and has an average of 75 (dummy 50, 100, 100, 100, 50, 50) One got 1 rating (plus the dummy) and has an (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Thread scoring
|
| (...) that's exactly what I meant. Add up all the ratings made by humans, and divide it by the number of human ratings. :) Dan (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
