Subject:
|
Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:46:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1953 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Asher Kobin writes:
> Day in and day out, I am amazed at what IE5 can do. The extensibility is
> simply supurb. The rendering speed simply kicks Nav's ass (from perf stats).
> Of course I'm baised. I haven't used Nav for years (seriously). Ideally (for
> web developers and end-users), the world would use only one browser. I would
> like to see that browser be IE.
for the love of god, please no! Ideally there would be 10s of browsers
available, but they would all render the same pages in the same way. I have
never used IE, and have no plans to - especially since there's no version for
my OS of choice. I'm weening myself off netscape, since I am disappointed at
it's performance and stability :/
> PPS: Keep an eye out for IE5.5. One really cool feature is IFRAME
> transparency!
What's that? is it part of a standard, or is it the notorious Embrace and
Extend?
Dan
BTW, doesn't this belong in o-t.debate, or o-t.geek?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) fixing (...) Backward compat is a sometimes difficult issue to deal with. Case in point, because of the many differences in the rendering capabilities between Nav and IE, many site authors have to write small workarounds to get even polarity (...) (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
