To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 5375
5374  |  5376
Subject: 
Re: MSIE5 better but still buggy (was: Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:45:53 GMT
Viewed: 
1504 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:

Well, maybe you're right about that after all.  According to section 8.1.3 of
RFC1866[1] (HTML 2.0), "[t]he initial state has the first option selected,
unless a SELECTED attribute is present on any of the <OPTION> elements."
(This is completely bizarre!)

The HTML 4.0 spec redefines this to be undefined (it's up to the application
whether or not to select the first item in this case).

Thus, it appears that Netscape _went against_ the HTML 2.0 spec when it
implemented the <SELECT> tag, and that Microsoft _adhered_ to the HTML 2.0
spec when it implemented the <SELECT> tag.  We could say then that it's
actually the spec itself which is broken, since it provides no way to
guarantee that a multiple-select list box comes up with exactly zero items
preselected.  To its credit, in violating the HTML 2.0 spec, Netscape made
the <SELECT> tag work better than it was intended to.  It is unfortunate
(IMHO) that Microsoft did not also violate the spec.  If they had, then
the HTML 4.0 might now define <SELECT> in a more versatile way than the
crippled way that it does now.  >

Ok, well I couldn't stop from smiling when I read your post.

It sounds to me that Netscape did a little "embracing and extending" of its
own in this area :)

Does MSIE give any other way (though perhaps
some other ATTRIBUTE) whereby an HTML author can send a multiple-select list
and guarantee that _zero_ of the list items are preselected?  That would be
a nice workaround to the shortcoming in the spec.

I don't understand your question...



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: MSIE5 better but still buggy (was: Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer)
 
(...) I have a web page on www.lugnet.com which sends out four multiple-select lists. In each of those lists, I want _none_ of the list items to be pre-selected. If the user clicks Submit without explicitly selecting any items in any of those list (...) (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MSIE5 better but still buggy (was: Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer)
 
(...) Well, maybe you're right about that after all. According to section 8.1.3 of RFC1866[1] (HTML 2.0), "[t]he initial state has the first option selected, unless a SELECTED attribute is present on any of the <OPTION> elements." (This is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR