 | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) What is supposed to be broken about it? It looks ok in my MSIE 4. Frank (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I would be only too happy to hear that it actually is fixed in MSIE 4. Would it be too much trouble to ask for a screenshot? --Todd (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) I can send you one from my IE 5 if you want. LMK. -Shiri (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | MSIE5 better than MSIE4 & MSIE3 (was: Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) (got it, thanks). Most excellent -- it looks correct finally. The way it used to look was that it had thin horizontal white lines between each row of <TD>'s, due to the bug with the extra doubling of pixel borders around the images. I'm glad (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: MSIE5 better than MSIE4 & MSIE3 (was: Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm almost certain you can do this. The one time I remember trying it (during a time when I needed to be able to help people with questions on multiple browsers) it worked ok. No guarantees, though. (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Sure thing, take a look at: (URL) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
