Subject:
|
Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 22:42:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1446 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> Have you worked with a more recent version of MSIE than version 3? What
> might be interesting is to put up a test page with some of those other
> problems and see how many of them have been fixed.
A little bit, not a lot. We have MSIE4.5 and MSIE3 for MacOS here, and
I can still run MSIE3 under Win32/Win95 on an old box.
> Putting on blinders to a strong competing product seems to be a poor
> strategy, at least for something which is trying to be a widely used
> resource.
Lowest common demominator first, then frills.
> Well, Netscape has sure had it's share of "we'll do it differently" also.
But it also defined the browser in the early days. MS squashed that, and now
nobody defines it. :-/
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) IE 4.5 on the Mac almost approaches the level of non sucking. Stay away from Outlook Express, though. I honestly can't believe you're making broad sweeping comments about "braindead bugs" in a program that you don't even have available for (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) IE on (...) <- snipped a bunch of incompatibilities -> Have you worked with a more recent version of MSIE than version 3? What might be interesting is to put up a test page with some of those other problems (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
