| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Stanley writes:
> > Contrast this with the LUGNET article scoring mechanism, in which any
> > single person can only move a message up or down by at most 25% (if they're
> > the ONLY one casting an opinion) and by much less than that once several
> > opinions have been cast. The LUGNET article scoring system will be
> > averages-based.
>
> Well, I shoulda known you would come up with something better. I
> still think the human part of the equation could degenerate to
> Slashdot-like levels, but you will probably control it better.
If it fails, I'll take all the blame. But if it works, I can't take all the
credit; there was a big thread last week with lots of good ideas from other
people.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
