 | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | (...) 1. It will create more work for the admin council who by your suggestion have to preapprove these auction posts. 2. It will create confusion and friction because people will say, "Why can't I put my eBay auctions on then? It's all castle (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) (intentionally (...) Filter them out (...) want (...) out (...) auction (...) I agree 100%. (...) But that does not mean that that opinion does not exist? (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) No it doesn't. But meanwhile 11 people have participated in this thread. Except for you, Scott, who came up with the idea, not one person is in favor for it. Sure, 10 people don't represent the whole community. But show me one other person (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | "Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Fr2BII.J3z@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) announcements (...) them (...) favor (...) my (...) this (...) Sure. But sometimes it is difficult to change. Using this form of debate, it can be (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Actually, it's still a bad idea even if 90% (or 98%) of people wanted it, because it would alienate the last 10% (or 2%). That's not what kind of ship we're sailing here. The theme discussion groups are for discussions, not commerce. Nobody is (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) this (...) Actually, I suspect it has aliented or could alienate some people (a few names pop to mind(1)), but I would posit that those people are for the most part interested in bang for their buck, and not in discussion, so would generally (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Speaking as a buyer, this would be a convenience for me. There you go. However it's a bad idea anyway. That, I feel, does NOT contradict referencing auctions for valid reasons NOT related to promoting the auction itself, which I support (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | (...) I notice you choose to ignore this objection. I'lla dd that it also creates a lot more work for Todd. What exactly is the benefit of this suggestion? Very little as far as I can see. It creates a method for a small group of people to advertise (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
