 | | Discussing LEGO-related spam (Was: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | I've just received yet another Lego-related spam, and I want to discuss it (or at least mention it) on LUGNET. Unfortunately, my previous attempt seems to have been off-topic for lugnet.general (1). So where should I post these kinds of messages? It (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Discussing LEGO-related spam (Was: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn) —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) Hmm... At a guess, I'd suggest lugnet.people or lugnet.market.theory, or possibly both, depending on how you wanted to mention it. But then, you're probably not looking for a guess... Todd? James (URL) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Discussing LEGO-related spam (Was: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | (...) ...Perhaps a new group? lugnet.kill, with the first board being lugnet.kill.all-spammers? ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wildlink.com lugnet #160 (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Discussing LEGO-related spam (Was: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Ya, .general is most tailored in its chartre toward the LEGO product line -- only very slightly to community issues. (...) Depends on what you want to focus on. I'd suggest: .publish - if you want to talk about the general practice of (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Discussing LEGO-related spam (Was: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) You too, hunh? I received no less than 3 unsolicited e-mails concerning what may very well be an interesting Lego site, but considering one of them came to an address that I have *never* posted here or anywhere else and can only be found by (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Discussing LEGO-related spam (Was: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn) —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Ditto. I got the same spam 3 times, and had to complain (politely, because it was Lego related, afterall) no less than twice to be removed. Definitely not respectable practices coming from someone in such a friendly community. -Tim (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
