Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet news is barfing - Details
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Jan 2000 01:41:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
262 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 02:58:30 GMT, "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com>
wrote:
> Ok, I see the problem, there is a munged reference (in the edit window for
> this message, the references are highlighted except for one, which happens
> to be missing the ">" which makes it real obvious where the problem is.
Actually, that's not the problem. The problem is that References: is
exactly 511 characters (and yes, I counted.), no more and no less,
long.
It's a documented problem by now, see previous thread here. Cnews does
Bad Things to headers 512+ lines long, but it does Badder Things to
headers exactly 511 lines long -- it adds a spurious newline, which
according to RFC850 specs is interpreted as the end of the header
section (note that the subject: header comes after references: with
the newsclient you use.. mine does references: as one of the last
headers, presumably to avoid just such problems.).
Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lugnet news is barfing - Details
|
| Frank Filz wrote in message ... (...) Well, that one did, I'm getting the following error: (crud, I can't cut and paste so I'll try and re-type it) Outlook Express could not post the message 'Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])' to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
