 | | Re: Web Interface suggestion regarding threads —Paul Davidson
|
| | | Personally, I find that using a USENET client (like Outlook Express, even) for Lugnet is far quicker and easier. Collapsable and expandable threads and all the other organization perks are built in that way. -- Paul Davidson Shiri (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Web Interface suggestion regarding threads —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, but its a major pain when the threads jump groups. I used to read using Netscape Messenger, but it was too annoying, so I switched to the web interface. The only problem I have now is figuring out where I was when I read on different (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Web Interface suggestion regarding threads —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) read (...) Yeah, lucky for me, I only have one computer on the net ;-) (we have two other computers but we all want to work on this one ;-) But I still have problems whenever my Explorer breaks down (1) and I use Netscape instead - then I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Web Interface suggestion regarding threads —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) Yeah - I have a 15 year timeout on links, basically just so that I know what I've read! It's annoying when I switch between Linux and Win95 though, if my win partition wasn't drive-spaced then I'd try linking my linux history file, cookie file (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
